Hello.
Nice we have new work for the New Year, but some of it is flawed.
I get this stderr out on several tasks, and so do other users on the same tasks:

<core_client_version>7.18.1</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255)</message>
<stderr_txt>

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Thank you for having a look at the issues.

---

- - - - - - - - - -
Greetings, Jens

New work and apparently no issues anymore.
Thx.

---

- - - - - - - - - -
Greetings, Jens

New work didn't last, I didn't even see there was any...

Got today morning a batch of Gaia_3 tasks, sadly all failed at 16% :(

<message>
Disk usage limit exceeded</message>

Huh, interesting, seems Gaia broke my 10GB limit for BOINC files. I removed all limits and let's see what happens now.

EDIT:

Even with no limits, tasks failed around 15% mark, and Gaia was then using about 18GB of disk space (!). I'll suspend crunching new tasks until more is known.

Hi, I'm trying to understand why the previous data needed 3h calculations and the current input data counts so quickly. Because a certain calculation time is assumed, the result file takes on a monstrous size. I have reduced the calculation time to 5 min, increased the allowed size of the result file.
I am very surprised by this situation and apologise for the problem. It was a new packet of data as usual, and here such a surprise. A review of the results will show if the calculations are correct, but there is nothing to indicate that they are wrong, just that you are counting incredibly fast this time.

Hi, I'm trying to understand why the previous data needed 3h calculations and the current input data counts so quickly. Because a certain calculation time is assumed, the result file takes on a monstrous size. I have reduced the calculation time to 5 min, increased the allowed size of the result file.
I am very surprised by this situation and apologise for the problem. It was a new packet of data as usual, and here such a surprise. A review of the results will show if the calculations are correct, but there is nothing to indicate that they are wrong, just that you are counting incredibly fast this time.

In that 16% I haven't seen a change in calculation speed, based on how fast it was going, the estimated task time would be around 1.5-2h, so not really a change from the previous batches. At least for me.

The program randomizes the orbits based on the covariance matrix, then integrates the motion. It does this for 2h.
If the processor is fast it will draw 100 orbits, if it is slow it will draw 3 orbits.
And at this point, more than 1,000,000 orbits are being drawn.
I'm checking this data packet, because it seems to include bug....

Still no luck, every task I try fails in a computation error a few minutes in.

Today 1/26 I'm getting Computation Error on any task I try, so I've stopped in case it's me.
I don't know how to navigate BOINC too much, but for what it's worth I see
Output file 8_... for task 8_... absent. That might just be because there was no actual computations.
Any task only runs a few seconds before it errors.

Today 1/26 I'm getting Computation Error on any task I try, so I've stopped in case it's me.
I don't know how to navigate BOINC too much, but for what it's worth I see
Output file 8_... for task 8_... absent. That might just be because there was no actual computations.
Any task only runs a few seconds before it errors.

Nope not you, it happened on several of my pc's and I too stopped getting new tasks, mine were all the version 8 tasks

All computers return an error, I'm looking for the reason, thanks for the signal

Hi!

I am no longer getting any calculation errors, yay! But around 20-30% of my tasks fail with "download failed". Can it be a problem on my side?

EDIT: Probably not, such tasks fail for everyone: http://150.254.66.104/gaiaathome/workunit.php?wuid=9753

Hi,

I see. The inputs file are on system, I don't know what happen :(

I will check , when all task ended.

And now the tasks are flying, no errors, very smooth, thank you for your work in making this happen panie profesorze! :)